No. Family treatment must be confirmed from current official programme terms and the applicable law. Do not infer it from a different immigration category.
List relatives individually and wait for the rule
Create a family table with each person’s relationship to the principal, age, marital status, nationality, passport expiry, and intended activity. That information is useful planning material, but it does not establish entitlement to any programme benefit. If official material describes spouses, children, derivatives, fees, or separate payments, quote the current source accurately and preserve its date.
If it is silent, label the point unresolved rather than assuming the EB-5, E-2, or employment-dependent model will apply. A child nearing 21, a planned marriage, a nonmarital partner, an adult child, or a relative with a separate immigration history can materially affect household choices. School and employment plans should remain flexible until the person’s own status and authorization are clear.
Civil documents may need translation or correction, so inventory them early without treating that practical step as a promise of eligibility. Families benefit from an honest calendar: it shows what needs confirmation before someone leaves work, enrols a child, sells a home, or makes a nonrefundable payment. The family record should also identify whether someone has an independent route or a travel limitation that needs separate advice.
That prevents a principal applicant’s enthusiasm from becoming an untested assumption about a spouse, child, or adult relative. Official terms, not family preference, determine any programme treatment.